Which of the following is not a use case for Comply?

The correct choice is that containing compromised systems at scale is not a use case for Comply. Comply is primarily focused on compliance and security posture management, which includes continuous monitoring for compliance with standards, assessing vulnerabilities, and using benchmarks for security policy evaluations.

The first three options represent core functionalities of Comply: it allows for continuous vulnerability assessment, evaluates unmanaged devices for potential risks, and utilizes industry-standard benchmarks for compliance checks. These features help organizations maintain a strong security posture by ensuring that they adhere to necessary regulations and best practices.

In contrast, containing compromised systems typically falls within the realm of incident response and endpoint management rather than compliance assessment. While Comply can aid in identifying compliance issues that may relate to vulnerabilities, the act of containment involves active measures and response strategies often handled by other tools or systems designed specifically for incident management, rather than a compliance-focused application like Comply.